Fuse

Venture

Fund Launch & Market Entry

Raised

$170M

Commited Capital

$420M+

Engagement Type

Engagement Type

Operating Partners

ohn Connors (ex-Microsoft CFO), Bobby Wagner

Fuse

Venture

Fund Launch & Market Entry

Raised

$170M

Commited Capital

$420M+

Engagement Type

Engagement Type

Operating Partners

ohn Connors (ex-Microsoft CFO), Bobby Wagner

Making a New Firm Inevitable

Fuse was barely two years old when it set out to raise an institutional fund against firms with twenty-year track records. It had three real advantages — an Ignition pedigree, an unmatched community of Pacific Northwest operators, and a genuinely contrarian market thesis — but each was easy to miss from the outside. Dakotomy built the narrative and the deck that carried the raise, fusing those assets into a single argument: that Fuse was not a new firm taking a chance on Seattle, but the inevitable franchise of the most undercapitalized software ecosystem on earth.

The Challenge

A new venture firm has a credibility problem that has nothing to do with quality. Limited partners underwrite track records, and a two-year-old fund doesn’t have one yet. Founders choose investors on reputation and judgment, and a new logo carries neither by default. The default reading of any first institutional raise is ambition without proof.

Fuse’s problem was the opposite of most: it had the proof, scattered across three things that didn’t obviously add up to a firm. A pedigree — General Partners Kellan Carter and Cameron Borumand had been partners at Ignition Partners, joined by Ignition’s former managing partner and Microsoft’s former CFO John Connors, and by Brendan Wales, who had spent nearly a decade backing category-definers at Headline. A community — a strategic LP base drawn from the former senior leaders of Microsoft, Amazon, Nike, Costco, T-Mobile, Boeing, and Coinbase. And a thesis — that the Pacific Northwest was the most underserved major software market in the world.

Each advantage could be misread in isolation: a track record that seemed to belong to the old firm, a roster that read as a logo wall, a regional thesis that sounded like a consolation prize. The challenge was to make them inseparable — a single story in which the pedigree, the network, and the geography only made sense together, and together made Fuse inevitable.

The Work

We started from a conviction the brief made non-negotiable: the deck is not a summary of Fuse, it is the instrument that decides what Fuse will be understood to be at the moment capital is on the table. So we built an architecture of inevitability. The narrative resolves into three claims that compound — the right foundation, the right community, the right market. Stated separately, they’re features; sequenced, they’re a logic that ends less like a pitch than like arithmetic.

The move the whole story turned on was reframing an Ignition track record as Fuse’s “Fund 0.” Carter and Borumand had led real deals with real returns inside Ignition’s sixth fund before spinning out — a 64% net IRR and 7.2x MOIC the team had already produced. Rather than let that history belong to the old firm, we let a two-year-old firm answer the only question every LP asks — can you do this? — with evidence instead of conviction.

We made the community the moat, not the garnish, reframing the roster of regional titans from a list of names into an operating system: proprietary sourcing, an edge in competitive rounds, revenue-driving customer introductions, and a talent network that placed executives directly into portfolio companies. A founder choosing Fuse wasn’t choosing money — they were choosing the Pacific Northwest’s entire operating elite.

And we promoted the thesis from regional to inevitable. Backed by a capitalization index showing the Northwest carrying far more opportunity per venture dollar than the Bay Area, the geography stopped being a limitation and became a claim: not a Seattle fund, the Seattle fund. The brand expression carried that position the whole way down — confident, founder-first, and restrained where it mattered, reinforcing the argument on every page rather than competing with it.

The result is a firm whose pedigree, community, and thesis are now simply how it is understood. Fuse raised its institutional fund and became the defining early-stage firm of the Pacific Northwest — following its inaugural fund with an oversubscribed $250M successor, one of the largest venture funds ever raised in the region, and over $420M in committed capital across the franchise. We didn’t add anything Fuse didn’t already have; we made what it had impossible to misread.

Making a New Firm Inevitable

Fuse was barely two years old when it set out to raise an institutional fund against firms with twenty-year track records. It had three real advantages — an Ignition pedigree, an unmatched community of Pacific Northwest operators, and a genuinely contrarian market thesis — but each was easy to miss from the outside. Dakotomy built the narrative and the deck that carried the raise, fusing those assets into a single argument: that Fuse was not a new firm taking a chance on Seattle, but the inevitable franchise of the most undercapitalized software ecosystem on earth.

The Challenge

A new venture firm has a credibility problem that has nothing to do with quality. Limited partners underwrite track records, and a two-year-old fund doesn’t have one yet. Founders choose investors on reputation and judgment, and a new logo carries neither by default. The default reading of any first institutional raise is ambition without proof.

Fuse’s problem was the opposite of most: it had the proof, scattered across three things that didn’t obviously add up to a firm. A pedigree — General Partners Kellan Carter and Cameron Borumand had been partners at Ignition Partners, joined by Ignition’s former managing partner and Microsoft’s former CFO John Connors, and by Brendan Wales, who had spent nearly a decade backing category-definers at Headline. A community — a strategic LP base drawn from the former senior leaders of Microsoft, Amazon, Nike, Costco, T-Mobile, Boeing, and Coinbase. And a thesis — that the Pacific Northwest was the most underserved major software market in the world.

Each advantage could be misread in isolation: a track record that seemed to belong to the old firm, a roster that read as a logo wall, a regional thesis that sounded like a consolation prize. The challenge was to make them inseparable — a single story in which the pedigree, the network, and the geography only made sense together, and together made Fuse inevitable.

The Work

We started from a conviction the brief made non-negotiable: the deck is not a summary of Fuse, it is the instrument that decides what Fuse will be understood to be at the moment capital is on the table. So we built an architecture of inevitability. The narrative resolves into three claims that compound — the right foundation, the right community, the right market. Stated separately, they’re features; sequenced, they’re a logic that ends less like a pitch than like arithmetic.

The move the whole story turned on was reframing an Ignition track record as Fuse’s “Fund 0.” Carter and Borumand had led real deals with real returns inside Ignition’s sixth fund before spinning out — a 64% net IRR and 7.2x MOIC the team had already produced. Rather than let that history belong to the old firm, we let a two-year-old firm answer the only question every LP asks — can you do this? — with evidence instead of conviction.

We made the community the moat, not the garnish, reframing the roster of regional titans from a list of names into an operating system: proprietary sourcing, an edge in competitive rounds, revenue-driving customer introductions, and a talent network that placed executives directly into portfolio companies. A founder choosing Fuse wasn’t choosing money — they were choosing the Pacific Northwest’s entire operating elite.

And we promoted the thesis from regional to inevitable. Backed by a capitalization index showing the Northwest carrying far more opportunity per venture dollar than the Bay Area, the geography stopped being a limitation and became a claim: not a Seattle fund, the Seattle fund. The brand expression carried that position the whole way down — confident, founder-first, and restrained where it mattered, reinforcing the argument on every page rather than competing with it.

The result is a firm whose pedigree, community, and thesis are now simply how it is understood. Fuse raised its institutional fund and became the defining early-stage firm of the Pacific Northwest — following its inaugural fund with an oversubscribed $250M successor, one of the largest venture funds ever raised in the region, and over $420M in committed capital across the franchise. We didn’t add anything Fuse didn’t already have; we made what it had impossible to misread.

Next

RECENT ARTICLES

The Great Concentration

Global Shift: The Sovereignty Shift

Funding

Venture

Q1 2026 Rewrites The Record Books As AI Pulls Startup Funding To $300 Billion

Insights from peers to your inbox.

Explore growth hacks and wisdom from the top Founders and Venture Capitalists.

SMP500 +.50%
nASDAQ (.50%)
DOW +.50%

Insights from peers to your inbox.

Explore growth hacks and wisdom from the top Founders and Venture Capitalists.

Insights from peers to your inbox.

Explore growth hacks and wisdom from the top Founders and Venture Capitalists.

SMP500 +.50%
nASDAQ (.50%)
DOW +.50%